- Days left

Lawmakers create a "fat tax" for non-diet sodas

The Governor of New York, David Paterson, plans to unveil Tuesday a budget that includes an "obesity tax" of about 15% on all drinks that aren't low-calorie.

As the New York Daily News puts it, under the proposed tax a Diet Coke might cost $1, while an identical serving of regular Coke would be charged at $1.15. That's before the bottle deposit, which in New York State is 5¢ per container. Milk, even the whole-fat version, would not be taxed at that heightened rate, and water would be exempt, too.

In response, a spokesperson from the American Academy of Pediatrics praised the notion, claiming that jacking the price of such "liquid candy" would make kids healthier. Notice that the group didn't cite any proof that the 15¢ rise would dissuade anyone from buying a drink, because no such proof exists.

Now that manufacturers have filtered trans fats out of many foods, they are replacing partially hydrogenated oils with other types. Which of these should you be avoiding, too?

  • Soybean oil
  • Palm oil
  • Corn oil

You're stuck in a breakfast meeting and starving. Which would be the lowest-calorie choice from the tray of baked goodies?

  • Blueberry muffin
  • Butter croissant
  • Cinnamon chip scone

You need potassium to keep your metabolism revved and muscles strong. Which of these offers the most?

  • One medium baked sweet potato
  • One cup of fat-free yogurt
  • One medium banana

If you must have chips, which of these is the most nutritious?

  • Banana chips
  • Veggie chips
  • Potato chips

Calcium is key to building bones, but which of these dairy foods is NOT a good source?

  • Cottage cheese
  • Yogurt smoothie
  • Fat-free milk

Which salty snack contains the most sodium?

  • One sourdough pretzel
  • 17 salt-and-vinegar potato chips
  • A quarter cup of salted peanuts

Which of these salad toppings will set you back the most calories?

  • Roasted almonds
  • Butter-garlic croutons
  • Crispy chicken

Drinking Vitamin Water is a good substitute for taking a daily multivitamin.

  • True
  • False


Science may not bear out the claim that sugary sodas are necessarily more destructive than ones sweetened with chemicals, by the way -- they may just be destructive in a different way. In February, a Perdue University study showed that consumers who drink diet sodas may, in fact, gain more weight than those who stick to the non-diet ones sweetened with the industry standby, high fructose corn syrup.

The implication, I guess, is that Diet Coke is as healthy as water. That's ludicrous. The chemicals used in diet sodas, so the study suggests, changes your metabolism in a way that makes you more susceptible to getting fat. Or so that's the theory. We haven't lived with artificial sweeteners long enough to truly determine their effect over lifetimes and generations.

This isn't the first time that a local government has tried to pay for shortfalls by taxing sweet things. Last winter, San Francisco tried to place taxes on soft drinks made with high fructose corn syrup (and not ones made with sugar) in an effort to pay for things that might battle obesity, like bike paths and nutrition education. The Center for Science in the Public Interest came out against the tax, which was geared toward attacking corn syrup and left sugar alone, a major reason it never gained traction. Gov. Paterson's proposed tax doesn't put corn syrup in the bulls eye, although because of its ubiquity in sugary drinks, it's still the essential target.

There's little doubt that high fructose corn syrup is a cheap, industrial-grade ingredient that, somehow, Americans have been coddled into accepting in nearly everything they eat. From soda to bread to ketchup to steak sauce, you'll find the stuff has replaced more unprocessed ingredients, like sugar, as manufacturers try to cut costs as deeply as possible. Just try to purchase items without the stuff, and you'll be spending a lot of time reading labels in the grocery store aisle.

If you could track the rise of American obesity, you'd find that our waist sizes and diabetes rates grew almost precisely with the growing use of high fructose corn syrup, which started finding its way into nearly everything within the past 20 years.

That hasn't stopped the high fructose corn syrup industry from launching some pretty snide propaganda commercials aimed at shutting down anyone with complaints about its deleterious effects. The fact is that sweeteners in general aren't ideal. Recent studies indicate that sugar has the same effects on cravings as illicit drugs.

But taxing sugar drinks? I strongly doubt the new tax would be enough to keep anyone from drinking the stuff. A price bump like that wouldn't be distinguishable from slight inflation. I doubt most people would notice much. If government officials have reason to believe that high fructose corn syrup is dangerous, then I wish they would launch a proper study and prove it once and for all, like it did for nicotine. If they can do that, then they can get away with a sin tax that's a lot more lucrative than 15%.

Besides, if our government thinks that corn syrup is so bad for us -- so bad for us that it wants to tax us for eating it -- why is it subsidizing its manufacture through the corn industry? That floods the market with corn products and has resulted in sugar becoming something of a luxury ingredient. Taste a Coke made in Mexico, where real sugar is still used, and you'll notice a difference in flavor. It also takes about 75 gallons of water to produce just one pound of corn, and that inefficient ratio affects everyone -- or will eventually. If the government is so concerned about cleaning up our diets, it shouldn't take the fight to our wallets before it curtails the industry handouts that make corn syrup so prevalent to begin with.

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

What is Inflation?

Why do prices go up?

View Course »

Advice for Recent College Grads

Prepare yourself for the "real world".

View Course »

TurboTax Articles

What Are the Tax Penalties for Smokers?

Starting in 2014, the Individual Shared Responsibility provision of the Affordable Care Act made you responsible for having minimum essential coverage, or MEC, in health insurance. Otherwise, you need to be eligible for a health care exemption, or you could pay a penalty when filing your income tax return. This requirement for minimum essential coverage applies to smokers and nonsmokers alike. If you're not covered by an employer's health plan and are a smoker, you can go to the health care marketplace to find MEC. If you're still unable to comply, you may have a penalty applied.

5 Steps to Navigate the Healthcare Marketplaces

To navigate the Health Insurance Marketplace, you have to know what you want from a health plan. Have your previous plan handy to make comparisons, as well as household and income information. If this is your first health plan, be aware of your needs and know your tax situation. Eligibility depends on the size of your family and combined income from all sources.

What Is Form 8941: Credit for Small Employer Health Insurance Premiums

Small business owners who subsidize the cost of employee health insurance premiums may be able to get some of that money back by claiming the credit for small employer health insurance premiums on their taxes. Some of the eligibility requirements, however, limit the number of people a business can employ and the average annual wages they earn. Qualifying as a small employer can reduce your tax bill by the amount of the credit you report on Form 8941.

What Is Form 8911: Alternative Fuel Vehicle Refueling Property Credit

In light of rising gasoline prices and environmental concerns, consumers have become more receptive to buying cars and trucks that run on types of fuel other than gasoline. The U.S. government introduced a tax incentive to encourage the installation of facilities to store or dispense alternative fuels in 1992. That incentive has evolved into a tax credit that also applies to equipment that recharges electric cars. If you equipped your home or business to accommodate alternative fuel vehicles, you may be able to use Form 8911: Alternative Fuel Vehicle Refueling Property Credit to reduce your federal tax obligation.

What Is Form 8885: Health Coverage Tax Credit

The health coverage tax credit is a program in place for tax years from 2002 to 2013 to help eligible individuals and families by paying a portion of premiums for qualified health insurance programs. Since the legislation authorizing the credit expired in January 2014, tax returns filed in 2014 for the 2013 tax year represent the last time eligible taxpayers can claim the credit.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum