Child care a luxury? Why parents are cutting back
byDec 10th 2008 2:30PM
We're not alone. Everywhere in the U.S., parents are looking at the high costs of full-time child care and choosing to opt out; or at the very least, cut back to a few days a week, or half-days, to save money. The Wall Street Journal today reports a spat of layoffs and falling enrollment at child care centers around the country; yesterday's Oregonian spotlighted struggling preschools. When hours are reduced or the mortgage payment gets steeper (or, more likely in many cases, the credit crunch means you have to live within your means); child care becomes a luxury, not a necessity.
The WSJ points out how many parents are working from home with young children present (I type this as my two littlest boys play trains in the living room; I know!) and suggests parents should not take children out of group care altogether (it's good for their development) and try to not get too stressed out (your emotional communication impacts children as much as your verbal communication). Easier said than done. The story also details "an elaborate three-generation scaffolding of relatives," hard on grandparents, who often must work, as well.
While the idea of child care as a luxury may seem ridiculous, finding quality child care is indeed a first-world struggle. In all but the upper-middle class, child care is the responsibility of family members and neighbors; in many family-run businesses, it's common to see the young children behind the counter and the older ones helping with the work after school. If our economy is, indeed, in a prolonged downturn, I predict full-time child care will be a perk that only the wealthiest two-income families even consider.