Everyone knows that Social Security is seriously in need of reform. But now that the retirement savings of so many Americans have been decimated by declines in the stock market, shoring up the program seems more important than ever.

Meantime, the options for what to do are dwindling. It's clear now that President Bush's main proposal for reform -- putting the money in the stock market -- would have been a recipe for disaster. Congress already raised the age you start getting Social Security to 67 for all people born after 1960, so raising it even further -- especially as increased unemployment forces more people into early retirement -- seems ludicrous. Both presidential candidates are against increasing the retirement age any further.

So what's left? McCain wants to set up a bipartisan commission to solve the problem -- perhaps by letting people create private accounts that they could invest in the stock market. Obama wants to raise the payroll tax for people who make more than $250,000.

I think those are both bad ideas. My preference is that politicians find a fair way to reduce benefits so we can afford payments to folks that really need them. It seems pretty obvious that Social Security should not go to the rich. So we can start by phasing out payments over a certain income level. The sooner we start, the easier it will be to fix the program.

Don't miss the rest of our series on Makeovers Needed!


Something must be done soon. As baby boomers retire, the amount collected will be less than needed to fund the program in just nine years and the so-called "trust fund" will be depleted by 2041, according to government figures (via AP).

I'm 42, so if I start collecting Social Security at age 67, that will be 25 years from now, or 2033. That puts me and my age group right at the sweet spot where we face real worry that our Social Security benefits could disappear just when we're starting to count on them.

Reducing benefits now would be painful, but I'd rather know I was going to get something from Social Security, however small, than wonder if I'd ever get anything at all.

Update on 10/25/08: A fellow WalletPop blogger, Lita Epstein, schooled me on some misconceptions I had in the last line of my post. As she explained, even though the trust fund will be depleted by 2041 if Social Security isn't changed, that doesn't mean benefits would stop being paid out. It just means they would be paid out of current payroll taxes and the amount collected could cover most (but not all) of projected payments due at that time. Lita wrote The Complete Idiot's Guide to Social Security and Medicare so she knows this topic well!








Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Intro to Retirement

Get started early planning for your long term future.

View Course »

Introduction to Retirement Funds

Target date funds help you maintain a long term portfolio.

View Course »

TurboTax Articles

Does Everyone Need to File an Income Tax Return?

Not everyone is required to file an income tax return each year. Generally, if your total income for the year doesn't exceed the standard deduction plus one exemption and you aren't a dependent to another taxpayer, then you don't need to file a federal tax return. The amount of income that you can earn before you are required to file a tax return also depends on the type of income, your age and your filing status.

How to Write Off Sales Taxes

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) permits you to write off either your state and local income tax or sales taxes when itemizing your deductions. People who live in a state that does not impose income taxes often benefit most from this deduction. However, you might also be better off deducting sales taxes instead of income taxes if you make large purchases during the year and your total sales tax payments exceed those for state income tax. You can use either the actual sales taxes you paid or the IRS optional sales tax tables.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum